31 May 2006
Yann Guermonprez discusses how the arbitral tribunal should determine procedural law and looks at the question as to how one determines the seat of an arbitration in the absence of agreement.
31 May 2006
Yann Guermonprez discusses how the arbitral tribunal should determine procedural law and looks at the question as to how one determines the seat of an arbitration in the absence of agreement.
November 2011
As Stefan Cucos discusses, prior to March 2011 expert professionals enjoyed a partial immunity from negligence actions in circumstances where they were acting as expert witnesses. The case of Jones v Kaney means that if an expert provides negligent expert evidence that expert can be sued those instructing him. Whilst time will tell as to the full impact of this change, Stefan considers the implications of this decision not only for established experts but also the litigants on whose behalf they act.
11 September 2007
Jeremy Glover, in a paper given at the Construction Law Summer School 2007, held at Queen's College Cambridge, provides an over-view on the history and development of the FIDIC form of contract. The paper then goes on the review the different ways in which the employer and contractor are treated when it comes to making claims. This section includes a brief discussion on the different approaches under the civil codes and common law jurisdictions, which leads to a short comment about the treatment of force majeure.
Technology & Construction Court and the Civil Procedure Rules practice today
24 February 2003
22 April 2010
Toby Randle in a paper given at the latest Fenwick Elliott Construction Law Update Seminar held at Simpsons in the Strand, London reviews the alternatives to adjudication, in particular the use of Part 8 Proceedings. In doing so, he discusses the recent cases of Geoffrey Osbourne Ltd v Atkins Rail Ltd, Yuanda (UK) Co Ltd v Gear Construction Ltd and Banner Holdings Ltd v Colchester Borough Council.
10 November 2006